Celestial Weasel (celestialweasel) wrote,
Celestial Weasel


Why is there so much written about the Difference Engine, a thing that was not made and essentially had no meaningful influence on the development of the computer as we know it, compared to what is written about the Hollerith Type I Tabulator, which was and did? It is not as if they are nasty boring electronic machines, they are big and have plenty of moving parts. Is it just the appeal of 'that which is not'? By dint of never having existed, the difference engine wasn't used for all the boring things that computers are used for in the real world, and weren't sold by men in suits and ties?

Why is the basement of the Museum Of History Of Science not full of bits of real machines and heroic pictures of the men and women of The British Tabulating Machine Company instead of that wretched 'steampunk' exhibition (mutter mutter)? Notably, of course, Harold 'Doc' Keen who had worked for BTM since before WWI and designed the Bombes of Bletchley Park (based, of course, on Alan Turing's conception).

  • Sweet municipal dreams

    I owe posts on a couple of things, but I break my long silence to commend the new Saint Etienne album, Home Counties, to you. It appears to be on…

  • The Hanging Tree - 2 questions

    Two questions... one is a plot one and one is a 'emotional authenticity' one Plot one: Did I miss something or is there no real explanation as to…

  • The Hanging Tree

    When more of you have read it I will be asking a couple of questions.

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.