Celestial Weasel (celestialweasel) wrote,
Celestial Weasel
celestialweasel

Another dubious narrative

As with the periodic news stories about data leaks, I feel that the mainstream narrative about MPs expenses is slightly inaccurate. Whilst there has been some mention of journalists expenses, I think that what is being missed is that back before we reached the stage of late capitalism in which people are supposed to fuck up their lives / social lives / etc. by relocating or flying half way round the world at a drop of a hat for, at best, out of pocket expenses, it was quite normal to generously compensate people for this sort of thing.
I can think of two specific instances of people who essentially paid for large chunks of their houses by relatively generous relocation packages, in one case, they didn't actually move house - this was the sort of deal where he had to work further from home, so could have relocated, but decided to just commute a long way and was told he could have the money anyway. In neither case is there any suggestion of deceit / impropriety / kickbacks / whatever, this is just how things were done. I can think of two cases where I know all of the details, but I have heard of lots of similar things over the years, it is just how things were done. I think things began to change in the mid-80s - indeed at my second job I got 2 months B&B / cheap hotel accommodation paid for or could have had moving / conveyance costs if I'd owned a house, whereas people who joined a year before at the same grade got 6 months accommodation paid for AND moving / conveyance costs.
The 'I have paid off my mortgage so can claim less money, but since I could have not paid it off and got more, can I have that larger amount instead' incident sounds to me exactly the sort of thing that would have been nodded through, I do remember something vaguely similar happening.
The issue, really, therefore, is not that this is all ludicrous dishonesty, but that the way the scheme works for MPs harks back 25-30 years to a more generous age.
I am not saying that this makes it much better, but I think it does make some of the hue and cry rather intellectually dishonest.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 12 comments