Celestial Weasel (celestialweasel) wrote,
Celestial Weasel
celestialweasel

The grammar of bad Libertarian SF

There is something, which I cannot put my finger on, very specific to the way that bad Libertarian SF is written. As in, I was reading 'In the Kingdom of the Blind' by Michael Flynn and, after the first few pages of feisty black heroine and gay white sidekick infodumping at each other, I had a look at page i and sure enough 'winner of the Prometheus Award'.
See also L. Neil Smith, J Neil Schulman. Doctorow writes / can't write like a Libertarian too. I don't actually know his political views but I suspect there is a cluster of personality traits at work here, I'm sure Ms Borsook would have something to say...

It is not actually that bad a book until the point where the plot just peters out, then we get a long appendix of graphs (wars follow poisson distribution, Zipf's law, MTBF of civilisations, hey if you look from far enough away the timelines of western and eastern civilisations look kind-of similar, yada yada, the famous 55, 14,9 and 7 year economic cycles overlaying each other [or whatever the numbers are, don't know don't care]).

In other book news, the geek anti-defamation league should be picketing Ian Rankin I suspect that not many geeks will spill confidential secrets to a coke-head lap-dancer being paid to be their girlfriend by a local gangland boss in order to get laid.
At least I haven't. Well, only once or twice.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments